Battle of the commodified services!
I can’t think of a reason why anyone wouldn’t leave either platform.
Battle of the commodified services!
I can’t think of a reason why anyone wouldn’t leave either platform.
To be a fly on the wall at Google Me meetings… Listening to engineers try to reverse engineer people into an easily searchable, sortable form.
Here’s what I how I imagine the project has progressed:
And soon it will launch!
And just a few weeks before it was supposed to launch. That’s not a good sign (Via VentureBeat)
They took it to a wind tunnel to find out.
“So as the goalkeeper sees the ball coming, it suddenly seems to change its trajectory,” McKeon said. “It’s like putting the brakes on, but putting them on unevenly”
(Via Discover)
Ian Bogost suggests a new term.
Trying to pin language to new devices and usage is like nailing Jello to a wall. Usage may vary, and there’re are a lot of tricks an engineer may grasp that are functionally invisible to the user.
Plus, the term ‘multitasking’ is a bit odd for a mobile device. Given the screen size, true multitasking is guaranteed to not occur 99% of the time for 99% of users, under the best of conditions.
Despite this, people want multitasking. At least they want the word, whether or not they want the function is another matter entirely. In the last 2 years, I’ve surveyed and focus-grouped prospective smartphone buyers in several cities. Multitasking was overwhelmingly desired, but when people were pressed to describe why the wanted multitasking or what they would use it for they couldn’t elaborate.
The only answer I ever received was background audio, a fine feature indeed (one I’m thrilled to have in the updated MLB app) but hardly full-fledged multitasking.
“King’s Meadow,” Mogwai.
There is a sound in this song that sounds just enough like my email notification sound to cause me to keep checking it.
After watching the USA lose to Ghana, I’m placing my bets regarding soccer’s football’s soccer’s popularity in the USA. I believe it’s not going to catch on, mostly because of that damn clock.
Many will be optimistic, but in the end we’re not going to care. Pundits will blame the bad calls or the loss to Ghana. I blame the clock.
The clock counting upwards would be bad enough, but when combined with penalty time audiences have only a rough idea of when the game is actually over. In America–-for better or for worse–-that’s not going to fly. We want buzzer-beaters. We want games won when the chips are tangibly down, not just late goals. Sure, Baseball might not have a clock either, but even then games aren’t over when a ref looks at their watch and decide enough time has passed.
Without an impartial clock, we lose drama that the lowest common denominator can understand. The person stumbling into the room with nothing vested in the game can see the score change right before the clock runs out. The athlete beating the other team isn’t as obvious as the athlete beating the clock. You don’t need to know the history of the Lakers and Celtics to gather the drama if the seconds are running out. Without a countdown clock, Americans need to grasp soccer first before they’re rewarded. And my bet is we’re not going to work for our entertainment.
A new word to describe the post-data plan human. The Simbiont’s ever-present connection to the internet allows them to offload human responsibilities like memory, guidance, and amusement to an electronic device.
What else are we holding wrong????
Have they opened the FaceTime protocol yet? If so, there are at least 3 devs rigging up a Google App Engine, iPhone 4-only Chat Roulette clone. (Via Gizmodo)
EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
If Steve has been playing World of Warcraft up until curtain time, and key purchases must occur while Steve is onstage, please ensure that a staffer will be available to complete the transactions at appointed times.